Do Nuclear Weapons Are Also a Hoax?

Source - http://heiwaco.tripod.com/bomb.htm 

Why a 4 400 kg heavy Atomic Bomb with only 61 kg of uranium-235 did not work 1945 and does not work today ... or ever! The free Neutrons couldn't do it!




Introduction - just Propaganda
We are all told at school or reading books or learn one way or another that a first atomic bomb - a Weapon of Mass Destruction, WMD - was dropped by US Air Force on Hiroshima, Japan, in the morning of August 6, 1945, to end the 2nd World war. A second atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki a little later to really stop the war. BBC suggests it happend like this! Oliver Stone also belives in the atomic bomb and should study this article.
According the paper Blast Loading and Blast Effects on Structures - An Overview, by T. Ngo, P. Mendis, A. Gupta & J. Ramsay, The University of Melbourne, Australia, 2007 we learn: "An explosion is defined as a large-scale, rapid and sudden release of energy. …

In a nuclear explosion, energy is released from the formation of different atomic nuclei by the redistribution of the protons and neutrons within the interacting nuclei (sic), whereas the rapid oxidation of fuel elements (carbon and hydrogen atoms) is the main source of energy in the case of chemical explosions. … The detonation of a condensed high explosive generates hot gases under pressure up to 300 kilo bar and a temperature of about 3000-4000C°. … The hot gas expands forcing out the volume it occupies. As a consequence, a layer of compressed air (blast wave) forms in front of this gas volume containing most of the energy released by the explosion. Blast wave instantaneously increases to a value of pressure above the ambient atmospheric pressure. This is referred to as the side-on overpressure that decays as the shock wave expands outward from the explosion source. After a short time, the pressure behind the front may drop below the ambient pressure (Figure 1). During such a negative phase, a partial vacuum is created and air is sucked in. This is also accompanied by high suction winds that carry the debris for long distances away from the explosion source".

It is suggested by many 'experts' that a nuclear explosion, if it really can take place, generates a blast wave with pressure of a million bar and a temperature of a million °C. Such an atomic explosion would evidently cause more damage than a simple chemical (napalm) bomb.



    Bank of Japan building 1946 at Hiroshima - 380 meters sideways from and about 600 meters (1 800 feet) below the alleged 'atomic bomb' explosion and blast wave center 1945!
    Downtown Hiroshima 1946! No 'atomic bomb' exploded and produced a blast wave here 1945!

Much more in that link - http://heiwaco.tripod.com/bomb.htm






Some news from one forum....

Source -  http://letsrollforums.com/do-nuclear-weapons-exist-t28427.html?s=99231f0426e4e6324486f9a93a4c849e&

My uncle was in the U.S. Army from 1957 to 1960 where he witnessed many nuclear tests while stationed at Enewetak Atoll in the Marshall Islands. He has written down his experiences in his memoir which he was kind enough to share with me but from which I will only offer a few passages. You see, I haven't asked his permission because I don't think he would appreciate the context. I have been convinced for quite some time that what we refer to as "Nuclear Weapons" are all part of the arsenal of fraud our leaders have used against us since the dawn of civilization, and I don't have the guts to tell him I think he was subject to an elaborate illusion, and not a series of nuclear tests.

I don't doubt that his memoirs are an accurate account of the events, so for a history-buff like myself I was delighted to have a personalized slice of life from one of my favorite eras, the Era of Fraud. As I read my uncle's descriptions of the mushroom cloud from "Oak" with its intense heat and the shock wave, it suddenly struck me how they did it, or at least how I would have done it if I wanted to try to fool a world traumatized by the Second World War into believing I had the power of god in my hands.

All the evidence I have seen leads me to the rather happy conclusion that Nuclear Weapons do not exist. The evidence is abundant but the easiest way to cut to the chase is to discuss the reasons why most folks believe Nukes DO exist, namely the following:

• Hiroshima and Nagasaki - these two cities were wiped out by atomic weapons, surely that's proof enough, right? Well, when the evidence is examined, from photographs, to official damage assessments, to alleged eyewitnesses, maybe not.
• With so many nuclear physicists, nuclear power plants, nuclear subs, nuclear aircraft carriers, not to mention universities and other independent scientists, PhDs and the like, surely someone would talk, right? This is much like saying "nukes are real because everyone says so".
• Thanks to the nuke tests, there are huge craters and areas where the sand was turned to glass, surely that's proof enough, right? Okay, so if you were trying to make a population believe you could harness the power of the sun, wouldn't you want to give the smart ones something to believe in? Can only a nuclear weapon create a large crater? Can anything other than a nuke create glass?
• Radiation and desolation - many folks will say they have loaded nukes on ships and consequently needed to wear radiation badges and were trained with a Geiger counter, surely that's proof of nukes, right? Unless you have your own tools and know how to calibrate and maintain them properly, no, they could just as easily be saturated or calibrated to pick up background radiation, so when it comes right down to it, we're reduced to taking the word of the very people who are perpetrating the ruse. As far as the nuclear desolation goes, Nagasaki and Hiroshima are thriving metropolises today. - Nuf said.
• Cancer and radiation burns - Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors had burns, but then so did those from Dresden and Tokyo. Cancer rate figures are controlled by both the Japanese government and the U.S Government, both of whom are involved in the ruse. In addition, U.S. Soldiers were used as test dummies for nukes and many got cancer, but cancer can just as easily be caused by any number of the toxins the military has been testing on soldiers since before Hammurabi.
• The Soviet Union had their own nuclear program, are you saying they're fake too? Yes.
• Electromagnetic pulses, what about that? Surely folks at Lets Roll know that EMPs are not exclusive to nukes.

I remember when I first heard about this concept, my reaction was to scoff and become almost angry with disbelief, so I did the research to prove the guy wrong who told me, but I couldn't do it. The more I dug the more comical the whole nuke idea became.

I consider nukes to be "science magic" for the unwashed masses. Nukes are like a religion for most folks, but think about it this way, without the "nuclear scare" how much money could have been spent on roads, schools and farms in America, or in any of the other countries? We know the money power loves to hoard their money, and what better way to suck money out of the flock than by creating a top-secret weapon using radioactive substances which can only be tested using tools provided by the government and the military? It's like the emperor's new clothes in reverse; we're the naked ones.

For the sake of national security, NASA and the nuclear weapons industry became a black-hole of control for the money power, so if you want to know WHY they'd do such a thing, just look at how much money has been thrown at them over the last seven decades. How's that for an incentive for fraud?

Using compartmentalization no one person can make a nuke, and their research and development are astronomically expensive, so what's not to love about them? Would the mafia get in on this game? Would the criminal/ruling classes of the world want a piece of such a money machine?

Without the "WMD" scare, would we sheeple blindly accept invasions of nations that otherwise pose no threat to anyone? Would the crimes of our leaders be more transparent in such a world? How relieved would you be if it turned out nukes are a hoax and they can't destroy America with the push of a button?

If they'd lie about 9/11, Kennedy, Lenon, the Moonwalks, etc., etc., etc., what wouldn't they lie about?

If you think Nukes are real, then by all means use this thread to convince me, but I'm betting you'll convince yourself they're fake.

Here are some links to get your juices flowing. These guys are a bunch of douchebags as far as I'm concerned, but it doesn't make them wrong:

Much more in that link.

http://big-lies.org/NUKE-LIES/www.nukelies.com/forum/index.html